Salta al contenuto

Accessibility statement

Prepared on 27 October 2026 and updated on 28 October, from measurements taken on this site.

We sell a plugin that helps people find accessibility problems. It would be hard to explain if this site had them. This page says what we have done, what we measured, and what is still not good enough.

Conformance status

This site aims at WCAG 2.1 level AA and is, at the date above, partially conformant: most of it meets the standard, and the parts that do not are listed below by name.

“Partially conformant” is the honest answer. No independent audit has been carried out, and no one has tested these pages with a screen reader in daily use — our own measurements are not a substitute for either.

What we measured

Across the eight public pages, on 27 October 2026:

  • One h1 per page and no skipped heading levels, so the outline can be used to navigate
  • A “skip to content” link as the first stop for the keyboard
  • No image without an alt attribute; decorative shapes marked so assistive technology skips them
  • A visible focus ring on everything that takes focus, shown for the keyboard and not forced on the mouse
  • No horizontal scrolling down to a 375-pixel window
  • Text contrast checked by computing the colour actually under each line — gradients, textures and translucent layers composed in order, not read off a single value
  • prefers-reduced-motion honoured in the stylesheets and in the JavaScript, which reads its durations from the same switch
  • No cookie banner, no pop-up and no overlay that can trap the keyboard
  • No content that only JavaScript can reach: with scripting blocked in the browser, the price tiers and the questions and answers are all in the page. The script turns them into tabs and drawers, it does not hold the content

We measure rather than look. A screenshot has shown us a page that looked right and was not, often enough to stop trusting it.

What is not good enough yet

The menu links in the footer are 25 to 26 pixels tall. That clears the 24 × 24 minimum of WCAG 2.2, but not the 44-pixel target this project set itself. The compact spacing is deliberate; the small target is the price, and we have not found a way to keep one without the other.

On a narrow screen the menu button needs JavaScript. With it switched off, the button does nothing and the links in the header are not shown. No page becomes unreachable, because the footer carries every link on the site, but the way in from the top of the page is lost. It is on the list to fix.

No audit, and no testing with real users. Everything above was measured by us, on our own work. That is the weakest kind of evidence there is.

English only, for now. Italian and French are coming, together with a way to switch between them.

The demo videos are placeholders. When real recordings replace them they will need captions and a transcript, and they will not go up without.

About Mentora Accessibility

Our plugin analyses a page and suggests what to change. It does not certify a site, and it cannot make one legally compliant — no tool can. Accessibility is a practice, and software only shortens the part of it that a machine can see.

Tell us what we missed

If something on this site gets in your way, write to info@mentoralabs.it. Say which page and what happened; if you use assistive technology, telling us which one helps a great deal. We answer, and we fix.

This statement is reviewed whenever the site changes in a way that affects it, and the date at the top moves with it.